Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €69.9 vs €569.61
- Up to 72% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900F - €0.29 vs €1.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 129% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-2400S - 551 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
241
43%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
551
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.03/FPS
28%
Price, €
€569.61
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €569.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |