Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600KF is 4426 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600KF
- Performs up to 50% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G530 - 159 vs 106 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-14600KF - €20.16 vs €279.53
- Up to 89% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-14600KF - €0.19 vs €1.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
10%
Price, €
€279.53
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
106
66%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14600KF | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |