Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-7400 - 193 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €24.8 vs €276.11
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-13600KF - €0.14 vs €1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
9.790209790209792%
Price, €
€276.11
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €276.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37759 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
173
89.63730569948186%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37760 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1176
42.81033855114671%
Multi-Core
3232
20.966590982808953%
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-7400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |