Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 4003 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Remnant II than FX-4100 - 103 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - €19.39 vs €276.11
- Up to 91% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-13600KF - €0.25 vs €2.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.68/FPS
9.328358208955223%
Price, €
€276.11
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €276.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38715 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
78
75.72815533980582%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38715 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600KF | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |