Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2645 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-6700 - 167 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €154.18 vs €305.76
- Up to 46% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13600K - €0.98 vs €1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
53%
Price, €
€305.76
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €305.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
158
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €154.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |