Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1358 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 74% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-9400F - 172 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - €148.18 vs €315.7
- Up to 18% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-13600K - €1.5 vs €1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
172
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.84/FPS
81%
Price, €
€315.7
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €315.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 105 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
99
57%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€148.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €148.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13600K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |