Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1253 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 51% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9100F - 542 vs 360 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€266.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €266.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 242 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |