Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - €185.4 vs €341.75
- Up to 43% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-13700KF - €1.3 vs €2.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-13400F - 149 vs 143 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
95%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€185.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €185.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1270 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
56%
Price, €
€341.75
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €341.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 819 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |