Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 17% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-4100 - 526 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400 - €20.59 vs €225.61
- Up to 88% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Core i5-13400 - €0.05 vs €0.43 per FPS
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Buy for €225.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |