Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12600 is 1918 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12600
- Performs up to 35% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 74 vs 55 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600 - 44 vs 12 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €303.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
49.557148882328136%
Multi-Core
9619
98.95072523402942%
Intel Core i5-12600 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 22 |
12 | Threads | 44 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 145 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |