Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 1988 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 145 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 25% better in World of Warcraft than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 225 vs 180 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €311.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76895 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
43.64784546805349%
Multi-Core
9619
59.292362694939285%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 16 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |