Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-940 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-940 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4502 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-940.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-940 - 223 vs 188 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-940 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-940
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €49.0 vs €169.1
- Up to 66% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-11600KF - €0.26 vs €0.76 per FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
34%
Price, €
€169.1
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €169.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Buy for €49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-940 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |