Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 4214 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 39% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom II X4 830 - 146 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €27.62 vs €167.82
- Up to 77% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-11600KF - €0.26 vs €1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.15/FPS
22%
Price, €
€167.82
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €167.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
105
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |