Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Dota 2 than Core i7-6700T - 237 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - €134.93 vs €210.77
- Up to 22% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i5-11600K - €0.69 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
237
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
77%
Price, €
€210.77
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €210.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17395 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
195
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€134.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €134.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17396 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |