Key Differences
In short — Core i5-1145G7 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-1145G7 is 700 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-1145G7
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 194 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 28 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-1145G7 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
183
94%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-1145G7 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Tiger Lake-U | Codename | Colfax |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |