Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1258 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-8350K - 117 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-8350K - €101.9 vs €199.76
- Up to 53% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-8350K - €0.87 vs €1.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8080 minutes ago
Buy for €199.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8081 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |