Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 640 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-8350K - 179 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-8350K - €81.96 vs €199.76
- Up to 60% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-8350K - €0.46 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €199.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4867 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4866 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |