Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 10% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G530 - 182 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €20.16 vs €101.9
- Up to 79% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-11400F - €0.12 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
21%
Price, €
€101.9
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 533 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
165
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 533 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |