Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i5-11320H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 197 days newer than Core i5-11320H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11320H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11320H - 212 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11320H - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11320H
Mobile • Jun 21st, 2021
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11320H | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 21st, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
