Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3047 days newer than Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 25% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4130T - 153 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i9-12900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Core i3-4130T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
