Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Core i5-11300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1092 days newer than Core i5-11300H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11300H
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11300H - 223 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11300H - 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i5-11300H
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11300H | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
| 10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Iris XE 80EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
