Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1764 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Minecraft than Core i5-6400 - 740 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €100.22 vs €121.91
- Up to 6% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-10600KF - €0.15 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
740
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
93%
Price, €
€121.91
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18148 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
673
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |