Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 3400G - 138 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €101.54 vs €121.91
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-10600KF - €0.76 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
86%
Price, €
€121.91
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18744 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
133
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18744 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |