Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i3-6100 - 116 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €68.52 vs €121.91
- Up to 27% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-10600KF - €0.77 vs €1.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
73%
Price, €
€121.91
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19274 minutes ago
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |