Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 236 vs 232 FPS
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €121.91 vs €379.64
- Up to 68% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.52 vs €1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.91
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18143 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
232
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.64/FPS
31%
Price, €
€379.64
32%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |