Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 3161 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G530 - 237 vs 201 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €20.16 vs €91.6
- Up to 74% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-10400F - €0.1 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €91.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |