Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 2942 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3500X - €20.16 vs €231.18
- Up to 91% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 3500X - €0.14 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than Celeron G530 - 153 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 6 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
144
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 187 minutes ago
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |