Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8130U outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8130U is 1898 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8130U
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 266 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
250
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Feb 13th, 2018
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8130U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD 620 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |