Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1013 days newer than Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 12% better in Diablo IV than Core i3-8100 - 195 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 64 vs 4 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
174
89.23076923076924%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Single-Core
1245
75.22658610271903%
Multi-Core
3405
23.35551135194458%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |