Buy on Amazon
€82
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2749
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $799
Availability
MSRP in USD: $799
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 1069 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 8% better in Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 299 vs 278 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 64 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 180 vs 280 Watts
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
92.97658862876254%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€82
100%
AMD RYZEN THREADRIPPER 1920X
Buy for €82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
70.93655589123867%
Multi-Core
6976
47.84964675217779%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Castle Peak | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 12 |
64 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 280 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
