Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1492 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 30% better in Rust than Celeron G1620 - 197 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-7350K - 55 vs 60 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 60 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
