Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Phenom II X4 830 - 119 vs 109 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - €27.62 vs €68.52
- Up to 57% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-6100 - €0.25 vs €0.58 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
109
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 166 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-6100 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Skylake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
Intel HD 530 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |