Buy on Amazon
€55.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Phenom II X4 830 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1784 days newer than the cheaper Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 65% better in The Callisto Protocol than Phenom II X4 830 - 107 vs 65 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - €27.62 vs €55.85
- Up to 19% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-4370 - €0.42 vs €0.52 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-4370 CPU Verwendeter 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 3,3 GHz 4M 54W LGA1150
Buy for €55.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
FPS
65
60%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€27.62
100%
Value Winner
AMD Phenom II X4 830 CPU verwendet 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop-Prozessor 2,8 GHz 6M 95W Sockel AM2+ Sockel AM3
Buy for €27.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 830 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2009 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Haswell | Codename | Deneb |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
