Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4170 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4170 is 1076 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 1400 - 181 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i3-4170 - €74.97 vs €146.34
- Up to 48% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4170 - €0.42 vs €0.81 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €146.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10351 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
178
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10353 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |