Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4170 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4170 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1197 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4170.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €146.34 vs €379.64
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.94 vs €2.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-4170 - 158 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4170 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
156
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.34
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12924 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.4/FPS
39%
Price, €
€379.64
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12925 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |