Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2430 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Rocket League than Core i3-4160T - 758 vs 694 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
758
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€258.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €258.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |