Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1812 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-4160T - 124 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€131.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €131.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
936
56.590084643288996%
Multi-Core
1796
22.167366082448776%
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |