Buy on Amazon
€261.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1368 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i3-4160T - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.2GHz, 8 Kerne, Socket AM4) YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
