Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1777 days newer than Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i7-860 - 268 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |