Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Core i3-390M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 653 days newer than Core i3-390M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 41% better in League of Legends than Core i3-390M - 58 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-390M - 6 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
58
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 510 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Arrandale | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |