Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2996 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-380M - 161 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€430.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3805 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |