Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9880H outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9880H is 3101 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-9880H - 35 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9880H
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-380M - 131 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-380M
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Core i9-9880H
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | Intel Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
