Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Core i3-380M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500U is 2994 days newer than Core i3-380M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Performs up to 6% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-380M - 197 vs 186 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-380M - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-380M - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-380M doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2010
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-380M | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Arrandale | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |