Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2323 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3250 - 271 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 20 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €736.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
33.756345177664976%
Multi-Core
1130
12.058478284067869%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |