Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3496 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 55 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 25% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3250 - 194 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€621.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €621.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2558 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |