Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7500F outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7500F is 3695 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7500F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 7500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F
- Performs up to 26% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-3250 - 402 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €223.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 22nd, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
19.387755102040817%
Multi-Core
1130
8.965407807045382%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7500F |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 22nd, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |