Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1758 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3250 - 411 vs 374 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €221.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75677 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
40.24205748865356%
Multi-Core
1130
24.088680451929225%
Intel Core i3-3250 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Jun 9th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |