Buy on Amazon
€20.16
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 91 days older than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1620 - 207 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
203
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1620 CPU Verwendeter 2-Kern-2-Thread-Desktop-Prozessor 2,7 GHz 2M 55W LGA1155
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
