Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 97% cheaper than Core i5-10600KF - €4.25 vs €121.91
- Up to 96% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-10600KF - €0.02 vs €0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-3220 - 260 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €4.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18158 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
260
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
4%
Price, €
€121.91
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |