Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2978 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10850K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 39% better in Rust than Core i3-3110M - 210 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 20 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€329.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €329.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |